A Scientific Basis of Religions A Mathematical Estimation of Good and Evil in Societies: General Theory of Good and Evil in Creations

This paper explains the common basis of most major religions that unifies the teachings originating from Adam, Noah, Moses Abraham, and Muhammad Peacebeuponthem in guiding humans towards a common goal of betterment of life within the constraint of their personal, family, communal, and generic intellect.  The coverage spans far and wide as the universe, but the intellect is constrained and limited in the brain.  As far back as 1860, Gregor Mendel [1] introduced the concepts of genes as core principles based on three Laws (Law of Segmentation, Law of Independent Assortment, Law of Dominance) based on Mendelian Genetics.     In the 1953 to1954-time frame, the double genetic helix model (James D. Watson & F. Crick [2]) was presented.  Within these two major contributions to the knowledge of genealogy, neurons can make up connected networks of molecules (devices), switches (interconnected molecules), highways (fast passages), pathways and byways (slower discrete passages) that can span a cosmos in the mind that is as elastic as the mind that can encompass the knowledge and imagination; a marvel of creation and nature interwoven within one another. This composite and complex structure is indeed the human brain) that is able to wind, unwind and rewind within the numerous physiologies of the living species.   

Religion permeates body, mind and soul of most folks. Interactions crisscross the boundaries of these three.  Behavior, tradition, and customs become apparent.  Passions and feelings arise. Contracts and conditions are formalized.  Lives are born and end; numerous frameworks of culture evolve and dissolve.  Patterns of fame and glory emphasize and de-emphasize the lives of humans, both saints and crooks. Power and greatness elevate the status of humans to prophethoods at the very top and conversely these can lead humans to defamation and downright evil and ugly at the very bottom.  There is powerful personnel instinct to steer humans to top and bottom. At the steer the personal choices and agenda take control.  The extraneous social forces, the economic conditions, the education, status, and inclination surface.  A force of habit an undecisive bent of mind, or a chancy coincidence can alter the outcome: The strong are most likely to remain so, the timid shall flutter and fall to thoughtlessness. The true metal of mind shows up at this stage.  The controversial opposites between good or evil becomes evident in most choices of lifetime(s).  Such is the case at the beginning stages in the walk along the “good” or “bad”,  ethical or nonethical, or those who habitually favor “Truth, Virtue, and Beauty” or (TVB) [ Greek Philosophers, 3] or those who habitually practice “Deception, Aggression and Hate” or (DAH) [4] in the context of this paper.  The events mentioned here are not just individualistic but generic.  They can occur in most portrayals  of lives, circumstances, and species or even individuals, circumstances, and societies.  During the latter stages of intellectual evolution (inherited and acquired) as the mindset becomes less elastic, the inflection of human personality becomes infrequent, if not impossible.   

Keywords: life, personality, actions, behavior, relationships, instincts, inclinations, Ethics in Society